J.G. MAJALIWA MWANJALOLO, V. MUWANIKA,, J.R.S. TABUTI, , C. KIZZA LUSWATA, J. NAMPIIJA, E. SEBULIBA, S. MPIIRA and A. NYAMUKURU Makerere University, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. INTRODUCTION Soils and forest vegetation are known as the major terrestrial carbon storage systems (Buringh, 1984; Batjes, 1996). The recognized importance of these two carbon pools in mitigating climate change has led countries to study their carbon stocks and initiate the assessment of enhancing and maintaining carbon sequestration of these resources. Carbon sequestration is recognized as one of the key processes of atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction (IPCC, 2007). For the soil pool, carbon sequestration contributes to soil fertility enhancement (Rao et al., 2007) through the moderation of cation exchange capacity (CEC), water holding capacity, soil structure, resistance against erosion, nutrient retention and availability and buffering against sudden fluctuations in soil pH (Lal, 2005). Soil C sequestration is done directly and/or indirectly (Soil Science Society of America, SSSA, 2001). Direct soil C sequestration occurs by inorganic chemical reactions that convert CO2 into soil inorganic C compounds such as calcium and magnesium carbonates. Indirectly, soil carbon sequestration is done through afforestation/reforestation which are seen as potentially attractive mitigation strategies, as wood production, soil fertility enhancement and carbon (C) storage combined (Pacala and Socolow, 2004; Fisher et al., 2011). Through this process, C sequestration occurs as plants ABSTRACT This study identified the carbon sequestration potential of the most valued trees species by farmers in Mayuge district, Uganda. Composite soil samples were collected 1.5 to 2 m away from the tree trunk for carbon content and bulk density at two different soil depths (0-15 cm and 15-30 cm). Soil samples were collected from eight trees of each species, 8-10 years old, on a lixic ferralsol within a radius of 5 km, occurring in different land-use types including land which had been under fallow for 8-10 years. Soil carbon stock did not significantly vary between the different trees and averaged 31.54 Mg ha-1 and 27.05 Mg ha-1 for 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth, respectively. The effect of land-use and depth on soil carbon stock varied with tree species (p<0.05). Implications of these findings to future studies in Agroforestry as well as to communities in the Lake Victoria rural landscapes are discussed in this paper. Key words: Agroforestry, carbon density, Eucalyptus, land use, Maesopsis eminii, Uganda RESUMÉ Cette étude a identifié le potentiel de séquestration du carbone des espèces d’arbres les plus appréciées par les agriculteurs dans le district de Mayuge en Ouganda. Des échantillons de sol ont été recueillis de 1,5 à 2 m du tronc d’arbre pour déterminer la teneur en carbone et la masse volumique apparente à des profondeurs de sols de 0-15 cm et 15-30 cm. Des échantillons de sol ont été prélevés sous huit espèce d’arbres de 8 à 10 d’âge sur un sol ferralitique dans un rayon de 5 km, et sous différentes utilisation des terres, y compris sous jachère pendant une période de 8 à 10 ans. Le stock de carbone dans le sol n’a pas varié de façon significative entre les différentes espèces d’arbres et en moyenne 31,54 Mg ha-1 et 27,05 Mg ha-1 a été observé pour la profondeur de 0-15 cm et 15-30 cm, respectivement. L’effet de l’utilisation des terres et de la profondeur sur le sol des stocks de carbone varie avec les espèces d’arbres (p < 0,05). Les implications de ces résultats dans le cadre des études avenir dans le domaine d’agroforestie tout comme celui des études communautaires sur les flancs du Lac Victoria sont discuteés dans cet article. Mots clés: Agroforesterie, la densité de carbone, Eucalyptus, Utilisation de terre, Maesopsis eminii, Ouganda 306 Farmers’ preferred trees carbon sequestration capacity photosynthesize atmospheric CO2 into plant biomass which can indirectly be sequestered as soil organic carbon (SOC) during decomposition processes. The amount of C sequestered at a site therefore reflects the long-term balance between C uptake and release mechanisms and depends on the type of tree (amount and quality of biomass input provided by tree), the type of soil and their managements (Woomer et al., 1994; Jackson et al., 2000; Jobba´gy and Jackson, 2000; Woomer et al., 2000; Sauerbeck, 2001; Wright et al., 2001; Lal, 2005). On-small scale farmers’ gardens, the type of trees found or those which are grown is generally dictated by farmers’ preference and expected potential benefits from the trees. Therefore, building carbon stock on farmers’ garden requires the full participation of farmers. This is important because most of the land where trees are managed is outside protected areas and on private land. Secondly, farmers are key stewards of plant management and make decisions regarding which species to maintain or to destroy on their private land. To enhance and encourage wider on-farm tree planting, it is necessary that the species that farmers value most and which they are ready to manage are identified (Kahurananga et al., 1993; Dalle and Potvin, 2004). To make an effective choice of species that can contribute to climate resilience, we need to also determine which species have the most potential to sequester carbon. This study was therefore conducted to identify the most valued trees species by farmers and the carbon sequestration potential of targeted indigenous tree species. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted in Mayuge district, particularly in the Kigandalo sub-county, located in the eastern region of Uganda, 120 km from Kampala the capital city and 40 km from Jinja town (Figure 1). The district is bordered by Lake Victoria in the south and is relatively flat with high ridges and isolated hills, undulating lowlands and perch vents. The hills are linear and of a convex nature with rolling slopes. The lowest points 1,200 m above sea level are located along the lake and the highest 1500 m above sea level is found in the northern part of the district. The rainfall is bimodal 33o33'0''E 33o34'0''E 33o33'0''E 33o34'0''E 0o25'0'N 0o25'0'N 0o25'0'N 0o25'0'N Figure 1: Sampled points on lixic ferralsols in Mayuge district - Uganda 307 J.G. MAJALIWA MWANJALOLO et al. with wet seasons occurring from April-June and August-November. The annual average rainfall is 1200 mm with an increasing rainfall gradient from the north (900 mm) to the south. The two rainy seasons are punctuated with a longer dry season December- March and short one July - August. These seasons enable farmers to have at least two growing seasons. Major crops grown include maize, cassava, groundnuts, cotton, cocoa, coffee, beans, sweet potatoes, finger millet and sunflowers. The soils are generally reddish brown sandy loam classified as lixic ferralsols in the upper well drained soils. Identification of priority species preferred by farmers and which farmers are interested in propagating An ethnobotanical survey was conducted from July to September 2012, in three villages Bukomya, Iwuuba and Nabukone, to identify priority species preferred by farmers and which they were willing to propagate. A total of 90 farmers were interviewed using a guided questionnaire in face to face interviews. This sample size was determined using Israel (1992) for the 2012 estimated population of the sub-county (62630 people), allowing for a 10% error. The focus of the interviews was to determine: the most preferred woody species (how often it was cited by farmers), existing tree management practices, existing constraints and opportunities in the context of tree management, as well as aspects of tree tenure. Respondents were also requested to list species that are becoming locally scarce and those which are becoming more abundant as well as factors contributing to these dynamics. This information is not reported in this study. Determination of carbon sequestration capacity of the different farmers preferred trees Priority tree species preferred by farmers were identified in the Kidangalo sub-county from the different land-use/cover in pre-selected villages. The land uses included fallow, households’ compound, woodlot, annual crop garden, perennial (banana and coffee plantations), garden and along road sides. Three types of woodlots comprising of Pinus spp. (Pine), Maesopsis eminii (Musizi) and Eucalyptus plantations were considered. Farmers were asked about the approximate age of their plantations and trees on their farms. Efforts were made to only select tree species which were 8-10 years old. Eight replicates of composite soil samples and soil cores were collected between 1.5 to 2 m from the trunk of the different tree species at 0-15 cm and 15-0 cm soil depth in each land-use type. These samples were analysed at the soil science laboratory of Makerere University for the following parameters: carbon content and texture for the composite soil samples, bulk density and hydraulic conductivity analysis for the core samples. The carbon content was determined using Walkey and Black method described in Okalebo et al. (2002). Soil texture was evaluated using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method (Bouyoucos, 1962). The obtained data were used for textural classification using FAO classification (FAOUNESCO- ISRIC, 1990). Bulk density was determined by the core method. Carbon stock per unit area was determined as a product of the carbon content and the mass of soil at each depth. In this study only carbon content, carbon stock, and bulk density are presented. Data analysis Variation of carbon stock under farmers’ preferred tree across different land-use/cover was analysed using ANOVA in Genstat 13th Edition. The means were separated using the Least Significant Difference test at 95% confidence level. RESULTS Carbon sequestration capacity of the trees Table 1 shows the bulk density and carbon content of soils under farmers’ preferred trees in the study area. Bulk density and carbon content varied significantly with the type of tree species (p<0.01) and soil depth (p<0.01). Generally, bulk density ranged between 0.75 g cm-3 and 1.21 g cm-3 in the top 0-15 cm soil depth and 1.08 and 1.22 g cm-3 for the 15-30 cm soil depth. Bulk density did not vary significantly with tree species for the topsoil, but was relatively lower for Senna spp. (Gassia) and Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) compared to other tree types. Soil carbon content varied with soil depth ranging between 1.25 % and 5.23 % within 0-15 cm soil depth; and between 1.14 % and 1.98 % for the 15-30 cm soil depth. It was high only for Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) in the topsoil and moderate for other tree types. It was moderate for topsoil under Milicia excelsa and Albizia coriaria (Musita). Senna spp. (Gassia) and Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) had high level of organic carbon for both soil depths. Soil under Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) had the highest value of soil carbon content and soils under Pinus spp. had relatively the lowest value for 0-15 cm soil depth. For the 15-30 cm soil depth Senna spp. had relatively the highest value and Persea americana the relatively lowest value. There was a linear relationship between organic carbon content and bulk density for the top 0-15 cm (R2=0.97, p<0.05) (Figure 2). After removing the values of Albizia spp., Ficus nantalensis, Ficus sycomorous and Senna a significant linear relationship was obtained between soil carbon and bulk density (R2=0.39; p<0.05). Table 2 shows the amount of carbon stored in the different soil depths under each farmer’s preferred tree. 308 Farmers’ preferred trees carbon sequestration capacity Table 1: Bulk density and carbon content of soil below farmer’s preferred trees Name of the tree/soil depth (cm) Bulk density (g cm-3) Carbon content (%) 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 Coffea spp. (Mwanii) 1.15 1.20 1.46 1.29 Fallow 1.20 1.19 1.35 1.37 Senna spp. (Gassia) 1.04 1.09 2.65 1.98 Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene) 1.06 1.17 2.52 1.72 Eucalyptus spp. (Kalitunsi) 1.10 1.15 2.17 1.58 Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa) 1.16 1.16 1.68 1.97 Antiaris toxicaria (Kirundu) 1.17 1.16 1.73 1.49 Mangifera indica (Muyembe) 1.13 1.15 2.32 1.67 Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) 0.75 1.08 5.23 1.77 Markhamia lutea (Musambya) 1.14 1.15 1.87 1.66 Albizia coriaria (Musita) 1.11 1.14 2.05 1.75 Maesopsis eminii (Musizi) 1.18 1.21 1.48 1.67 Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) 1.07 1.14 2.63 1.22 Milicia excelsa (Muvule) 1.13 1.17 1.89 1.86 Albizia spp. (Nongo) 1.16 1.24 1.51 1.59 Persea americana (Ovacado) 1.16 1.21 1.67 1.14 Carica papaya (Mupapali) 1.12 1.20 1.92 1.21 Pinus spp. (Pine) 1.21 1.22 1.25 1.34 LSD (p=0.001) ns 0.07 1.44 1.34 Table 2: Carbon stock in the different sampled soil layers Tree species Carbon stock (Mg ha-1) 0-15 cm 15-30 cm Coffea spp. (Mwanii) 23.83 23.82 Fallow 23.82 24.19 Senna spp. (Gassia) 45.03 29.35 Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene) 33.28 29.39 Eucalyptus spp. (Kalitunsi) 34.86 32.95 Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa) 30.15 25.87 Antiaris toxicaria (Kirundu) 31.69 29.61 Mangifera indica (Muyembe) 37.32 33.59 Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) 34.84 25.16 Markhamia lutea (Musambya) 31.08 29.95 Albizia coriaria (Musita) 33.06 28.93 Maesopsis eminii (Musizi) 27.02 22.29 Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) 43.95 32.87 Milicia excelsa (Muvule) 31.71 31.28 Albizia spp. (Nongo) 27.95 21.22 Persea americana (Ovacado) 26.75 21.18 Carica papaya (Mupapali) 32.16 24.44 Pinus spp. (Pine) 19.68 20.84 Average 31.57 27.05 p ns ns There was no significant effect of type of tree species and soil depth on carbon stock. However, the amount of soil carbon beneath each tree was relatively higher in the 0-15 cm compared to 15-30 cm except for Senna spp. It ranged from 19.68 Mg ha-1 (Pinus spp.) and 45.03 Mg ha-1 (for Senna spp.) for the 0-15 cm soil depth; and between 20.84 Mg ha-1 and 33.59 Mg ha-1 for Spanthodea campanulata. On average the amount of carbon stock averaged 31.57 Mg ha-1 and 27.05 Mg ha-1 for 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth respectively. Table 3 shows the relative change in carbon content and carbon stock compared to the control (fallow). The relative change was generally positive for all the trees except for Ficus nantalansis and Persea. More than 70 % relative change in soil carbon content was observed under Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) followed by Senna spp., Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba). Senna spp. (Gassia), Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) and Mangifera indica (Muyembe) for the topsoil. In the subsoil the relative change in carbon content did not exceed 45% for all the trees studied. It is important to note that the relative change in carbon content was negative under Pinus spp. (Pine) for both soil depths. Sub-soils under Carisa, Persea americana (Ovacado), and Ficus nantalensis 309 J.G. MAJALIWA MWANJALOLO et al. Figure 2: Relationship between soil organic carbon and bulk density Table 3: Relative change in carbon content and carbon density compared to land under fallow Name of the tree /soil depth Relative change in Relative change in Carbon content (%) Carbon density (%) 0-15 15-30 0-15 15-30 Coffea spp. (Mwanii) 1.46 1.29 0.04 -1.55 Senna spp. (Gassia) 96.3 44.53 39.71 21.50 Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene) 86.67 25.55 46.36 36.20 Eucalyptus spp. (Kalitunsi) 60.74 15.33 26.58 6.94 Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa) 24.44 43.8 33.04 22.39 Antiaris toxicaria (Kirundu) 28.15 8.76 56.68 38.84 Mangifera indica (Muyembe) 71.85 21.9 46.25 4.00 Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) 287.41 29.2 30.49 23.83 Markhamia lutea (Musambya) 38.52 21.17 38.80 19.58 Albizia coriaria (Musita) 51.85 27.74 13.45 -7.84 Maesopsis eminii (Musizi) 9.63 21.9 84.50 35.88 Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) 94.81 -10.95 33.10 29.32 Milicia excelsa (Muvule) 40 35.77 17.33 -12.27 Persea americana (Ovacado) 23.7 -16.79 12.28 -12.45 Carica papaya (Mupapali) 42.22 -11.68 35.01 1.03 Pinus spp. (Pine) -7.41 -2.19 -17.38 -13.86 (Mutuba) had a negative relative change for the carbon content and carbon stock in the 15-30 cm soil depth; This was subsequently reflected in the 15-30 cm carbon stock of Persea americana (Ovacado) and Pinus spp. (Pine). Soil under coffee, Albizia and Milicia excelsa (Muvule) had a negative relative change in carbon stock for the sub-soil. Soil carbon stock under farmers’ preferred trees and land-use types Tables 4 and 5 show variation in soil carbon stock beneath each tree species at 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depths. Four types of variation behaviors were observed: i) soil carbon stock variation with land-use and soil depth; ii) variation only with land use; iii) Bulk density (g cm3 ) Organic carbon (%) 310 Farmers’ preferred trees carbon sequestration capacity Table 4: Carbon stock under farmers’ preferred trees in different land-uses in Mayuge district (0-15 cm soil depth) Tree species Carbon stock (Mg ha-1) Banana Coffee Compound Eucalyptus Fallow Grassland Maize Musizi Pine Roadside Prob plantation plantation plantation plantation Coffea spp. (Mwanii) 23.85 26.24 21.40 ns Senna spp. (Gassia) 54.36 35.70 0.01 Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene) 26.81 43.72 29.31 0.001 Eucalyptus spp. (Kalitunsi) 29.35 34.96 34.76 ns Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa) 22.42 39.82 35.10 23.27 ns Antiaris toxicaria (Kirundu) 34.66 34.42 25.99 ns Mangifera indica (Muyembe) 31.48 52.01 ns Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) 33.20 51.06 29.80 42.26 17.87 0.04 Markhamia lutea (Musambya) 27.28 34.89 0.01 Albizia coriaria (Musita) 30.44 35.68 0.08 Maesopsis eminii (Musizi) 26.81 31.98 25.71 ns Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) 29.71 70.38 33.13 42.26 0.01 Milicia excelsa (Muvule) 29.09 29.28 31.92 37.50 ns Albizia spp (Nongo) 30.08 21.77 27.64 <0.01 Persea americana (Ovacado) 29.42 32.11 18.71 ns Carica papaya (Mupapali) 30.87 35.19 30.41 ns Pinus spp. (Pine) 15.81 23.55 ns Grand total 29.93 40.72 28.03 26.81 34.42 18.71 31.62 25.21 23.55 26.77 311 J.G. MAJALIWA MWANJALOLO et al. Table 5: Carbon stock under farmers’ preferred trees in different land-uses in Mayuge district (15-30 cm soil depth) Tree species Carbon stock (Mg ha-1) Banana Coffee Compound Eucalyptus Fallow Grassland Maize Musizi Pine Roadside Prob plantation plantation plantation plantation Coffea spp. (Mwanii) 21.67 25.96 ns Senna spp. (Gassia) 24.68 34.03 ns Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene) 24.37 32.39 31.42 ns Eucalyptus spp. (Kalitunsi) 28.38 34.96 35.50 ns Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa) 26.81 22.74 29.72 24.21 ns Antiaris toxicaria (Kirundu) 32.72 30.02 26.08 ns Mangifera indica (Muyembe) 39.48 27.69 ns Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) 28.77 25.53 23.86 22.47 ns Markhamia lutea (Musambya) 29.20 30.71 ns Albizia coriaria (Musita) 29.85 28.01 ns Maesopsis eminii (Musizi) 26.81 21.87 ns Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) 28.43 47.25 25.48 30.31 0.086 Milicia excelsa (Muvule) 24.72 24.98 32.26 26.90 ns Albizia spp (Nongo) 28.87 19.50 18.03 0.002 Persea americana (Ovacado) 22.32 20.04 ns Carica papaya (Mupapali) 21.15 27.73 ns Pinus spp. (Pine) 20.84 ns Average 25.87 29.71 27.18 24.37 29.31 20.04 27.51 21.87 20.84 23.34 312 Farmers’ preferred trees carbon sequestration capacity variation only with soil depth; and iv) no variation with land-use and soil depth. Soil carbon stock varied with land-use and soil depth beneath under Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) and Albizia spp. (Nongo). Soils below Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene) had relatively high carbon stocks when occurring on fallow soils compared to other landuses where this species was found. With Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), the topsoil under fallow conditions had also higher carbon stock than the sub-soil. Soil under Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) had higher carbon stock under coffee followed by maize, fallow and the banana for the 0-15 cm soil depth. For soil depth of 15-30 cm, maize had higher carbon stock compared to all other land-use beneath Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba). Under Albizia spp. (Nongo) tree species, soil carbon stock varied significantly with land-use and soil depth (P<0.05). Beneath Albizia spp. (Nongo), soil carbon stock was highest under banana followed by fallow for the topsoil (p=0.002), and higher under banana compared to fallow and casasava which had similar soil carbon stock for subsoil (p=0.076). Significant variation on soil carbon stock under different land-use types was observed beneath Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa), Senna spp., and Markhamia lutea (Musambya) (p<0.05). Beneath Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa), soil carbon stock was higher on fallow and maize gardens in the 0-15 cm topsoil compared to other land-uses (p<0.05). Soils carbon stock under Senna spp. varied significantly for the topsoil, and was higher on coffee plantation compared to the soil under fallow (p < 0.001). No significant difference in soil carbon stock was observed in the sub-soils under Senna spp. (p> 0.05). However, soil carbon stock beneath Markhamia lutea (Musambya) tree, in the topsoil, was higher under maize than under fallow (p<0.05). Under Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) carbon stock was relatively higher on coffee plantation, followed by fallow compared to other land-use for the topsoil (0-15 cm) (p<0.05). Soil under Antiaris toxicaria (Kirundu) did not show any significant variation due to the land-use where this tree species was found (p>0.05). Carbon stock under eucalyptus tree did not vary significantly across the land-use where it occurred and with soil depth (p>0.05). Beneath Mangifera indica (mango) tree, soil carbon stock did not vary with the type of land-use and soil depth, but showed a significant interaction between the effect of land-use and soil depth. Soil under mango tree tended to have more carbon stock in the sub-soils; while those found under fallow tended to have more carbon stock in the topsoil compared to the subsoil (15-30 cm). Beneath Albizia coriaria (Musita), soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with landuse, but varied significantly with soil depth (p=0.004). The interaction between soil depth and land-use was also significant (p=0.019). Soil carbon stock used under fallow was similar for the two soil depths, while under maize it was highest for the topsoil compared to the subsoil (p<0.01). Beneath Maesopsis eminii (Musizi), soil carbon stock did not significantly vary with land-use and soil depth. On the other hand, Milicia excelsa (Muvule) tree, no significant land-use type and soil depth effects were observed (p>0.05). Soil carbon stock under avocado and pawpaw varied only with soil depth (p<0.05) with the topsoil (0-15 cm) having more carbon stock than the sub-soil (15-30 cm). Carbon stock under Pinus spp.(Pine) plantation did not significantly change with soil depth (p>0.05). DISCUSSION Farmers preferred trees exhibited differentiated potential in carbon sequestration. High carbon stock potential was observed on Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) followed by Senna spp., Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba). Senna spp. (Gassia), Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) and Mangifera indica (Muyembe). The change in carbon stock varied with land-use and soil depth for Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba) and Albizia spp. Albizia spp. (Nongo), changed only with land-use for Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa), Senna spp., and Markhamia lutea (Musambya), and did not show any variation with land-use and soil depth for Milicia excelsa (Muvule), Persea americana (Ovacado), Carica papaya (Mupapalii), Albizia coriaria (Musita) and Pinus spp. (Pine). The magnitude of soil carbon stock observed in this study is relatively lower than the values observed in other regions of Uganda with similar soils (Nampiija et al., 2010; Twongyirwe et al., 2013). This is due to the variance in the dominant tree species in the different environment, and the fact that soil carbon stock is correlated with the age bracket of the tree considered, the type of soil, the initial soil carbon content and climatic conditions (Shi et al., 2013). Kaul et al. (2010) reported variance in maximum net annual carbon storage flux for the different categories of growing trees species in a forest environment. They estimated 1 Mg C ha-1yr-1 for slow-growing long rotation sal forests, 6 and 8 Mg C ha-1yr-1 for fastgrowing short rotation Eucalyptus and poplar forests, and 2 Mg C ha-1yr-1 for moderate-growing short rotation teak forests, Twongyirwe et al. (2013) research was conducted in an intact forest while Nampiija et al. (2010) studied a relatively better managed soils of Rakai district in Uganda. However, the generally no effect of the tree species on the stock of carbon in the soil is a reflection of the variability induced by land-use. Most of the tree species tended to have high values of carbon stock when they were under coffee plantation and on fallow compared to other land-uses. This is mainly due to the relatively high input added to coffee because 313 J.G. MAJALIWA MWANJALOLO et al. of its economic value, which can enhance its growth, hence increase the amount of litter fall and root growth. Similar observations on positive effect of fertilization related enhancement of C in tree biomass and soil C pool were made by Giardina et al. (2003). Some scholars have also noted negative effects of N addition (Jobidon, 1993; Luxmoore et al., 2008), and others observed no effects (Shujauddin and Kumar, 2003; Kim 2008). However, as reported by Nair et al. (2010), generally fertilization effects on tree plantations may be positive depending on the intrinsic fertility of the site, species, fertilizer doses applied, and the stage of stand development. At relative young growth stage tree fertilization is expected to stimulate growth (Lamp’l, 2012; VanDerZanden, 2014). Tree performance tend to be better under undisturbed conditions (fallow). In Nebraska for example, SOC concentration, in the 0- 7.5 cm and 7.5-15 cm soil depths, under undisturbed shelterbelt was 55% more than that in the adjacent crop field (Sauer et al., 2007). The same authors further observed that for a period equivalent to a third of a century, soils of 0–15 cm depth sequestered more SOC than the crop field. This was mainly due to absence of soil disturbance, increased inputs by litter, reduced erosion, and deposition of windblown material. Some trees did not induce change in soil carbon stock including Pinus spp. (Pine), Milicia excelsa (Muvule), Albizia coriaria (Musita), and Carica papaya (Mupapali). This corroborates observations by Parfitt and Ross (2010) that under Pinus spp. (Pine), grass is gradually shaded out by the unpruned trees, and completely disappeared after 6 years; and by year 9, soil microbial C and nitrogen (N), and net N mineralisation, decreased significantly compared with pasture. Close to the Pinus spp. (Pine) stem, soil C decreased significantly for three years. Research in Ivory Coast on M. excelsa trees showed that carbonate is also present in soils surrounding these trees (Braissant, 2005; Cailleau 2005; Verrecchia et al., 2006). However, it can precipitate in the soil pores if the pH increases up to 8.4 in the presence of calcium. For lower values of pH which is the case for soils of Mayuge and many soils in other parts of Uganda (Isabirye et al., 2004), carbonate ions present in the soil are pumped by roots in the same way as calcium or other nutrients, and enter in the xylem tissues or are leached out of the soil system (Cailleau, 2005; Verrecchia et al., 2006). In the tropical environment, litter is rapidly degraded by soil fauna, so C-oxalate stock is quickly consumed by oxalotrophic organisms. Since the oxalate is rapidly degraded, its quantity present in the soil at a given time, is extremely low. It is also possible that soil carbon build up was balanced by the loss for Albizia coriaria (Musita), Carica papaya (Mupapalii), and more so for the latter since it depends on critical nutrient management practices due to its continuous growth, flowering and fruiting habit. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS High carbon stock potential was observed in Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) followed by Senna spp. (Gassia), Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba), Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) and Mangifera indica (Muyembe). This potential varied with land-use and soil depth for Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba), but did not vary with land-use for nged only with land-use for Spanthodea campanulata (Kinalisa), Senna spp. (Gassia), and Markhamia lutea (Musambya), and did not show any variation with land-use and soil depth for Milicia excelsa (Muvule), Persea americana (Ovacado), Carica papaya (Mupapali), Albizia coriaria (Musita), and Pinus spp. (Pine). This study demonstrate that carbon stock can be improved by selective tree planting even on continuously cultivated land. It is therefore recommended that Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) followed by Senna spp., Artocarpus heterophyllus (Fene), Ficus nantalensis (Mutuba). Senna spp. (Gassia), Ficus sycomorous (Mukunu) and Mangifera indica (Muyembe) be promoted on agricultural land and protected by byelaws in Mayuge district. Research is needed in other districts of Uganda and other countries to identify preferred tree species with high carbon sequestration potential. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, for supporting this project. We also acknowledge the respondents who participated in this study and the farmers who allowed us access their land to collect the soil samples. STATEMENT OF NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST We the authors of this paper hereby declare that there are no competing interests in this publication. REFERENCES Batjes, N.H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science 47:151-163. Battisti, D.S. and Naylor, R.L. 2009. Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science 323:240-244. Braissant, O. 2005. Carbonatogénèse bactérienne liée au cycle biogéochimique oxalate-carbonate. Université de Neuchâtel. 214 pp. Buringh, P. 1984. Organic carbon in soils of the world. In: The Role of Terrestrial Vegetation in the Global Carbon Cycle: Measurement by Remote Sensing. Woodwell, G.M. (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. pp. 91–109 314 Farmers’ preferred trees carbon sequestration capacity Cailleau, G. 2005. Cycle du carbone et biominéralisation carbonatée en milieu continentale: La diagenèse des phases oxalate-carbonate. Université de Neuchâtel. 254 pp. Dalle, S.P. and Potvin, C. 2004. Conservation of useful plants: An evaluation of local priorities from indigenous communities in Eastern Panama. Economic Botany 58:38-57. Fisher, B., Lewis, S.L., Burgess, N.D., Malimbwi, R.E., Munishi, P.K., Swetnam, R.D., Turner, R.K., Willcock, S. and Balmford, A. 2011. Implementation and opportunity costs of reducing deforestation and forest degradation in Tanzania. Nature Climate Change 1:161-164. Giardina, C.P., Ryan, M.G., Binkley, D. and Fownes, J.H. 2003. Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Global Change Biology 9:1438-1450. Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report-Mitigation of Climate ChangeContribution of Working Group III. Isabirye, M., Mbeera, D., Ssali, H., Magunda, M. and Lwasa, J. 2004. Soil resource information and linkages to agricultural production. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9:215-221. Jackson, R.B., H.J. Schenk, E.G. Jobbágy, J. Canadell, G.D. Colello, R.E. Dickinson, C.B. Field, P. Friedlingstein, M. Heimann, K. Hibbard, D.W. Kicklighter, A. Kleidon, R.P. Neilson, W.J. Parton, O.E. Sala, and M.T. Sykes, 2000. Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecological Applicaction 10(2):470-483, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010 [0470:BCOVCA]2.0.CO;2. Jobbagy, E.G. and Jackson, R.B. 2000. The vertical distribution of organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Application 10: 423–436. Kahurananga, J., Alemayehu, Y., Tadesse, S. and Bakele, T. 1993. Informal surveys to assess social forestry at Dibandiba and Aleto Wendo, Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems 24:57-80. Kaul, M., Mohren, G.M.J. and Dadhwal, V.K.2010. Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy for Global Change 15:489-510. Kim, C. 2008. Soil carbon storage, litterfall and CO2 efflux in fertilized and unfertilized larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. Ecological Research 23:757- 763. Kumar, B.M. and Deepu, J.K. 1992. Litter production and decomposition dynamics in moist deciduous forest of the Western Ghats in Peninsular, India. Forestry and Ecological Management 50:181-201. Lal, R. 2005. Soil Erosion and Carbon dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research 81: 137-142. Lamp’l, J. 2012. Fall fertilization for established trees and shrubs. Growing a greener world. http:// www.growingagreenerworld.com/fall-fertilizationfor- established-trees-and-shrubs/. Accessed on 12th December 2015. Luxmoore, R.J., Tharp, M.L. and Post, W.M. 2008. Simulated biomass and soil carbon of loblolly pine and cottonwood plantations across a thermal gradient in southeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 254 (2):291-299. Moreno, G. and Obrador, J.J. 2007. Effects of trees and understory management on soil fertility and nutritional status of holm oaks in Spanish dehesas. Nutr Cycle Agroecosyst 78:253-264. Nair, P.K.R., Kumar, B.M. and Nair, V.D. 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for C sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 172:10-23. Nampijja, J., Isubikalu, P., Mukwaya, P., Majaliwa, J.G.M. and Adipala, E. 2010. Carbon stock trends in selected agro ecological zones of Uganda. Second RUFORUM Biennial Meeting 20 - 24 September 2010, Entebbe, Uganda. pp. 57-61. Pacala, S. and Socolow, R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968-972 Parfitt, R.L. and Ross, D.J. 2011. Long-term effects of afforestation with Pinus radiata on soil carbon, nitrogen, and pH: A case study. Soil Research 49(6): 494-503. Post, W.M. and Kwon, K.C. 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: Processes and potential. Global Change Biology 6:317-328 Rao, K.P.C., Verchot, L.V. and Laarman, J. 2007. Adaptation to climate change through sustainable management and development of agroforestry systems. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 4(1):1-30. Sauer, T.J., Cambardella, C.A. and Brandle, J.R. 2007. Soil carbon and litter dynamics in a red cedar-scotch pine shelterbelt. Agroforest Systems 71:163-174. Sauerbeck, D.R. 2001. Carbon dioxide emissions and C sequestration by agriculture-perspectives and limitations. Nutr. Cycles Agroeco. 60:253-266. Shi, S., Zhang, W., Zhang, P., Yu, Y. and Ding, F. 2013. A synthesis of change in deep soil organic carbon stores with afforestation of agricultural soils. Forest Ecology and Management 296:53-63. Twongyirwe, R.. Sheil D MajaliwaJ.G.M., EbanyatP., TenywaM.M., van HeistM., KumarL.. 2013. Variability of Soil Organic Carbon stocks under different land uses: A study in anafro-montane landscape in southwestern Uganda. Geoderma 193– 194 (2013) 282–289 VanDerZanden, A.M. 2014. Fertilizing Shade and Ornamental Trees. FS 103. Oregon State University, Extension Services. https://catalog.extension. oregonstate.edu/fs103
Share

Latest News

M9 Banana Hybrid hits the market
Friday, 23 June 2017
A high yielding, great tasting Matooke Hybrid developed by NARO with resistance to Black Sigatoka has taken the market by storm. M9 combines great taste, high yields resulting in favourable...
More inBanana in News  

The vast majority of the bananas currently grown and consumed were not conventionally bred but are selections made over probably thousands of years from naturally occurring hybrids. Cultivated bananas are very nearly sterile and as a consequence are not propagated from seed but rather through vegetative propagation, primarily suckers as well as more recently micropropagated or tissue cultured bananas. These factors, very old selections, near sterility and vegetative propagation, mean that these bananas have not been genetically improved either for resistance or improved quality and are becoming increasing in affected by serious pests and diseases.

Random images from our gallery

  • New Matooke Banana - Nabios_3

Latest videos